Looks like the report just points out that those languages are not memory-safe, and advises either switching to another, or running them on memory-safe processors. Then it says we should look into either of these solutions for the space industry, since it’s important.
Where does it say anything about a ban?
Or is this just Twitter being a bunch of dramatist ragebaiters, like usual?
I don't take it as an attempt to ban, only as a sensible precaution, probably a hint to potential government subcontractors that they can win points by ensuring their software meets the recommendations.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2024-03-04 12:55 pm (UTC)The whole twitter is having fun.
no subject
Date: 2024-03-05 05:01 pm (UTC)Where does it say anything about a ban?
Or is this just Twitter being a bunch of dramatist ragebaiters, like usual?
no subject
Date: 2024-03-05 05:59 pm (UTC)I don't take it as an attempt to ban, only as a sensible precaution, probably a hint to potential government subcontractors that they can win points by ensuring their software meets the recommendations.